Friday, September 6, 2013

MINSTRELSY, MASCULINITY, AND "BOB DYLAN" AS TEXT IN I'M NOT THERE. By: McCOMBE, JOHN,

MINSTRELSY, MASCULINITY, AND "BOB DYLAN" AS TEXT IN I'M NOT THERE. By: McCOMBE, JOHN, Post Script, 02779897, , Vol. 31, Issue 1
Database:
Literary Reference Center

MINSTRELSY, MASCULINITY, AND "BOB DYLAN" AS TEXT IN I'M NOT THERE

Maggie comes fleet foot Face full of black soot Talkin' that the heat put Plants in the bed but The phone's tapped anyway Maggie says that many say They must bust in early May
--Bob Dylan, "Subterranean Homesick Blues" (1965)
In the song above that plays over the DVD menu of I'm Not There (2007), the audience immediately encounters a "face full of black soot." Given the various ways in which Dylan has performed race for nearly five decades, the link here to blackface minstrelsy should not be surprising--especially in a song that appears on Bringing it All Back Home (1965), an album in which Dylan's acoustic folk past is juxtaposed with an electric Chicago blues present. Since blackface minstrelsy is a performance--one in which white entertainers frequently "performed blackness"--Dylan can be linked in numerous ways to this discourse. From his early 90s cover version of Stephen Foster's "Hard Times" (a song by an artist whose dialect songs were central to the minstrel show repertoire) to Dylan's decision to title his 2001 album "Love and Theft"--itself "thieved" from Eric Lott's influential study of minstrelsy and 19th-century American identity politics--Dylan clearly understands how race, like gender, is constantly performed, and he repeatedly acknowledges his debt to two centuries of African-American musical culture.
In the present essay, I am interested in how Dylan's career-long performance of race intersects with his performance of masculinity. The primary vehicle for my analysis will be Todd Haynes' Dylan biopic I'm Not There; in particular, I will focus on the character of Woody (Marcus Carl Franklin), one of the film's seven Dylan surrogates.1 In many ways, I'm Not There offers an alternative to the traditional Hollywood biopic. After all, six different actors perform the roles of these seven Dylan-like characters, and the film itself announces almost immediately that it is "inspired by the music and many lives of Bob Dylan." Haynes quite literally presents many lives for his audience to consider, and none of the characters is actually named "Bob Dylan." In Haynes' film, a fixed conception of Dylan's identity is not there; instead, what is there is ample evidence of a structure of feeling towards race and masculinity that resonates throughout Dylan's songs and live performances. Much like blackface minstrelsy signifies "a peculiarly American structure of racial feeling" (Lott 18), I'm Not There invokes Dylan's ties to minstrelsy to demonstrate how Dylan's performances of race, gender, and sexuality are deeply interwoven. While many works before Haynes' film have confirmed Dylan's mercurial nature, especially in terms of his musical influences and the constant re-invention of song arrangements, Haynes' film highlights the shape-shifter whose sense of gender identity is every bit as fluid. Just as blackface is a mask--one that has invited numerous scholars to consider how it functions and what it means--gender identity is also a mask or, better yet, a series of masks that I'm Not There encourages its audience to investigate.
I-PERFORMING BLACKNESS
In a 2007 Cineaste interview, Haynes clearly outlines one of his major agendas in I'm Not There: the director describes the biopic as a "deceitful genre" that "blend[s] fact and fiction in every scene" (Porton 20). Even though Haynes pushes at the boundaries of the biopic, he also acknowledges some of its key conventions, which means that dramatic moments of Dylan's life structure the narrative, including his decision to "go electric" at the Newport Folk Festival in 1965 and his motorcycle accident the following year. Nevertheless, the film's chronology is far from linear, and many of the casting choices intentionally raise questions, as Haynes, himself, emphasizes:
Take the choice of making "Woody" a little black kid who calls himself "Woody Guthrie." We all know that's not true to life. But you're forced to think about why that choice is being made--as opposed to the traditional biopic where you're not allowed to think about these choices because that would ruin the entire illusion. (Haynes qtd. In Porton 20)2
True to the spirit of his highly postmodern film, Haynes never explicitly answers the question he poses: why is a "little black kid" spouting phrases lifted from the voice and pen of Bob Dylan and bearing Guthrie's name? Only when "Woody" is analyzed within the context of the film's other Dylan-like characters do answers emerge. In addition, in a film rejecting linear narrative development--and in which the different versions of "Bob Dylan" are frequently intercut with scenes where other actors perform Dylan at different stages of his life--Haynes' choice to begin with Woody seems crucial to the film's aesthetic and ideological goals. I'm Not There formally privileges Woody's story, and I believe that "the little black kid" is the key to unpacking crucial linkages among the other stories that follow.3
Before viewers meet Woody, a grainy black and white POV shot leads Jude (Cate Blanchett) to the stage during what appears to be a date on Dylan's chaotic 1966 British tour. This shot is followed by a cut to a motorcycle speeding down a rural road and the crash--literally and figuratively--that removed Dylan from public life for several months at the height of his commercial success. The next series of shots takes place at an autopsy and reveals the lifeless body of Jude, followed by a series of still images of the actors cast as our various Dylans. Although we do not yet know their names, each image couples with a single word descriptor provided by a voice-over: "There he lay. Poet. Prophet. Outlaw. Fake. Star of electricity." For example, the "poet" is Arthur Rimbaud (Ben Whishaw), who fields questions during a McCarthy-like press conference/interrogation, while the "prophet" is Pastor John (Christian Bale), the late-70s-era evangelical Christian who rejects his classic, secular songs, much like Dylan did in 1979. What is most striking in this sequence, at least for the purposes of this essay, is that Woody's image accompanies the word "fake." I'm Not There is a film structured on an authentic/inauthentic binary, and the character deemed a "fake" surely possesses a formally privileged role. The multiple layers with which that term fits the relationship between Woody and the "real" Bob Dylan is what initiates the film's treatment of Dylan and his links to minstrelsy and masculinity.
Woody sometimes sounds like Woody Guthrie (e.g., the character's claim that "it only takes a fountain pen to rob a man") but more often sounds like Bob Dylan in his late teens /early twenties, even though Woody is depicted living in 1959, a period before Dylan actually used many of the words that Woody speaks. Not only does Woody sing songs in 1959 that Dylan would not release for several more years (such as an acoustic front-porch romp through 1965's "Tombstone Blues"), but Woody's lines are also frequently drawn from actual Dylan interviews. When two hobos ask Woody why he rides the rails, the reply derives from a 1966 Playboy interview in which Dylan explains his initial attraction to rock 'n' roll: "Carelessness. I lost my one true love. I started drinking. The first thing I know I'm in a card game. Then I'm in a crap game. I wake up in a pool hall […]" (qtd. in Hentoff 131). Haynes emphasizes the notion of a black character prone to "performing white," but also performing a white character (Bob Dylan) who was himself fond of performing black. What drives the racial performativity home is a brief scene in which artifice is layered over artifice, as Woody encounters another performer who produced a surprising real-life impact on the young Bob Dylan. As Dylan reports in Chronicles Volume One (2004), the tedious existence of life in Hibbing, Minnesota was once enlivened by the arrival of wrestler Gorgeous George:
[George] roared in like the storm […] in all his magnificent glory with all the lightning you'd expect. He had valets and was surrounded by women carrying roses, wore a majestic fur-lined gold cape and his long blonde curls were flowing […]. Gorgeous George. A mighty spirit. People said that he was as great as his race. (44)
Both George and Woody have created larger-than-life personas founded upon highly theatrical performances of masculinity. George sports his ostensibly un-masculine capes and flowing locks, while the eleven-year old Woody performs the role of a Dust Bowl-era Okie troubadour far removed from his "real" existence: he is a boy playing a hard-travelling man. The idea that Woody is also performing race is confirmed by the manner in which Gorgeous George and Woody first glimpse each other. Woody has just completed a musical performance at the carnival--one greeted with audience hostility (a recurring theme in Dylan's career)--and he is then thrown into the mud outside of a performance tent. As Woody emerges from the ground, his face is covered in mud: a black child literally donning blackface. Viewers can hardly ignore the layers of artifice in this single shot: black performing white but appearing in blackface, reminding us of minstrels a century before performing a version of blackness for receptive white audiences.
So how does an eleven-year old Woody-in-blackface make this biopic less "deceitful"? Keep in mind that Woody, living in 1959, is a child of the Eisenhower era, and the oft-asserted conformity and homogeneity of the fifties is something that Dylan knew well. As he once told biographer Robert Shelton, "You see, I don't come from what you would call a 'Great Society middle-class family in the suburbs.' Where I lived there aren't any suburbs. There's no poor section and there's no rich section. There's no wrong side of the tracks and right side of the tracks.… As far as I knew, where I lived, nobody had anything that anybody else didn't have, really" (qtd. in Shelton 25). While Dylan surely underreports the economic diversity of Hibbing, Minnesota, where he lived from 1946-1959, it was indeed an area largely populated by white European immigrants. So well before Dylan began to reinvent himself by adopting the Woody persona, Dylan reinvented himself in another significant way: performing blackness.
In his essay "'That Wild Mercury Sound': Bob Dylan and the Illusion of American Culture" (2002), musicologist Barry Shank discusses how Dylan's performance of "See That My Grave is Kept Clean" (1961) is analogous to blackface, an act in which Dylan both identifies with and distances himself from the Blind Lemon Jefferson original. Shank also observes linkages to minstrelsy prior to the beginning of Dylan's recording career. Citing Anthony Scaduto, Shank points to Dylan's simultaneous identification with, and distancing from, Little Richard while a student at Hibbing High. Dylan's 1959 senior yearbook cites his ambition "To Join Little Richard" (Scaduto 35), and we know that one of Dylan's high school rock and roll groups covered Little Richard's "Jenny Jenny." However, as Shank points out, Dylan also believed that Richard's "mistake was that [Richard] played down too low" (Dylan qtd. in Shank 105). In the performances of both "See That My Grave is Kept Clean" and "Jenny Jenny," Dylan's shift to a higher vocal register (and harmonica accompaniment in the former), allows a performance that is both authentic and autonomous: both black and not black--a tension central to blackface. Which is why a black Woody Guthrie--anachronistically riding the rails as a Depression-era hobo in that very same 1959--begins to make more sense: Dylan's late 1950's identity is a frequent assertion of his connection to, and distance from, African-American culture.
As an extension of Shank's arguments, Dylan did not merely sing Little Richard's songs in a higher register; Dylan also adopted Richard's image in other significant ways. As Robert Shelton reports, "Bob wore his hair in mounds around his forehead, Little Richard-style" (43) and even "studied black jargon" (38). Additionally, Dylan's sense of humor as a fifteen-year old carried with it an element of racial performance. A Hibbing friend describes Dylan's emerging "black humor": "the sort of put-on humor of a black person toward a threatening white" (Bucklen qtd. in Shelton 44). That Dylan was attuned to the practice of African-American performances of racial tropes in the presence of whites was no doubt confirmed by another high school acquaintance: a disc jockey named Jim Dandy who lived in neighboring Virginia, Minnesota:
Jim Dandy and his wife and kids were the only blacks among Virginia's twelve thousand residents. Bob heard him broadcast on station WHLB in the summer of 1957, and searched for the man behind the voice. He and John [Bucklen] were startled, but pleased, to discover that the DJ was black. Seeing that he was with simpatico lads, Jim dropped his radio "white voice" for hip black slang. The meetings went on sporadically for months. (46)
Given Dylan's immersion in cross-racial identification during his Minnesota years, the casting of a black Woody seems logical. The many lives of Dylan prior to his so-called "folk" or "protest" period--an era beginning in earnest with a brief residency at the University of Minnesota--include Dylan's carefully cultivated (and quickly discarded) personas as a rock 'n' roller (Little Richard), a poet of the Grand OF Opry (Hank Williams) and several others: some black and some white.4 Yet among these early influences, Woody Guthrie exerted a particularly strong influence. Bonnie Beecher, a Minneapolis friend, outlines the extent of the Guthrie identification:
Back in Minnesota he'd disappeared for a couple of months, he went on a trip, then he came back, talking with a real thick Oklahoma accent and wearing a cowboy hat and boots. He was into Woody Guthrie in a big, big way […] . When he'd had too much to drink you'd have to call him Woody to get a response […]. At the time it seemed ludicrous and pretentious and foolish, but now I see it allowing a greater Bob Dylan to come about, (qtd. in Bauldie 20)
Beecher's concluding point is one that Haynes' film seems to emphasize, with one important qualification: the Guthrie persona allowed several Bob Dylans to emerge. In addition, viewers of I'm Not There should note that even the assumed Guthrie identity could itself be a racial composite. Following Dylan's "conversion" to Woody in 1960--to invoke Robert Shelton's word (74)--Dylan's "Woody" was, in part, a mixed race performance, as well. During parties in the bohemian Dinkeytown neighborhood (near the of Minnesota campus) in 1959-1960, Dylan, "became the first guy to put the guitar and harmonica together, with that frame-holder around his neck. Nobody had ever seen this before. As far as I know, he was the first white performer to combine the Sonny Terry harmonica with the Woody Guthrie guitar" (Abrams qtd. in Shelton 69). Since Terry was an African-American bluesman and frequent Guthrie collaborator, Dylan's hybrid identity--one musical and racial--constitutes another performance of blackness, a practice I'm Not There foregrounds repeatedly.
II--BLACKNESS AND MASCULINITY
Dylan did indeed fixate on Guthrie's lifestyle and music, but not quite as early as the film's 1959 setting. Perhaps the discrepancy relates to the over-simplified notion that Woody's character "refers to Dylan's youthful obsession with folksinger Woody Guthrie" ("I'm Not There"). I would argue instead that Woody is a mask (upon a mask), one that certainly reflects Dylan's Woody obsession but has even more to do with an exploration of Dylan's evolving masculinity. Rather than make Woody nineteen years old, as Dylan would have been during his Guthrie conversion, Woody is eleven and simply performing an adult masculinity. Haynes foregrounds this performance with one of the first phrases that Woody utters: "My mind got mixed with ramblin' when I was oh so young." So an eleven-year old Woody, who makes exaggerated claims about his life experiences, is consistent with the nineteen-year old Dylan who performed the death-obsessed "See That My Grave is Kept Clean" on his debut album. But I suspect that there may be even more to this particular casting decision.
As a "little black kid," Woody also reflects a career-long interest of Dylan's: a focus on the African-American body--in particular, as sites of violence and identification. Whether the body belongs to boxer Davey Moore, who dies during a prizefight ("Who Killed Davey Moore"), or another boxer, Rubin Carter (depicted in "Hurricane" as "Buddha in a ten-foot cell"), or Black Panther George Jackson, who was shot and killed at San Quentin Prison in 1971, Dylan writes frequently of "damaged" African Americans bodies. One other black male body of interest to Dylan, and one who plays a role both diagetically and nondiagetically in I'm Not There, is Blind Willie McTell. Woody describes McTell as the "best blues singer east of Cannery Row," as well as the source of his aesthetic credo: "If you can sing these [traditional] songs and understand 'em, ain't no place you can't go." McTell serves as Woody's mentor, a role fulfilled for the real-life Dylan by Guthrie and another African American:
The first thing that turned me on to folksinging was Odetta. I heard a record of hers in a record store, back when you could listen to records in a store. That was in '58 or something like that. Right then and there, I traded my electric guitar and amplifier for an acoustical guitar, a flat-top Gibson. [Her first album] was just something vital and personal, (qtd. in Heylin 33)
By 1960 revered Guthrie above Odetta and all others, but he felt unable to match his hero's life experiences, a subject he broaches in "Song to Woody" (1961): "Hey, Woody Guthrie, but I know that you know/ All the things that I'm a-sayin' an' a-many times more" (Lyrics 5). Among other things, "Song to Woody" is an acknowledgment of role-playing: i.e., that the speaker's "hard travelin'" is merely a pose in comparison to the more authentic Guthrie.
In the film, Willie McTell serves an analogous role for the film's young Woody: an image of black manhood imagined, although not yet attained. Haynes skillfully reminds us that the figure of McTell exerts a fascination for the adult Dylan, as the soundtrack to Woody's narrative includes Dylan's 1983 song "Blind Willie McTell." The placement of this selection is formally privileged, as well; "Blind Willie McTell" plays as Woody's boxcar "ramblin"' ends, and the boy arrives at the bedside of a Guthrie look-alike. Except for brief glimpses of Woody in the "Billy the Kid" segments of I'm Not There, this is the last that viewers see of Woody. At the time he recorded "Blind Willie McTell," Dylan had renewed his interest in Judaism; as such, the song speaks of a journey from New Orleans to Jerusalem and invokes "tribes," "chain-gangs," and "the ghosts of slavery's ships," all of which could apply equally to Dylan's and McTell's ancestors. In this song, McTell functions for the adult Dylan as Guthrie had in "Song to Woody" more than twenty years earlier: the song's speaker still expresses feelings of inadequacy in the face of his role model: "I know no one can sing the blues/ Like Blind Willie McTell" (Lyrics 478). Of course, the Bob Dylan of 1961 and 1983, as well as the Woody character, nevertheless sing out; if the speakers in Dylan's songs and Woody are not yet the men they hope to be, then the act of "singing the blues" at least allows the artist to engage in the process of becoming a fellow artist, hard traveler and adult male.
Like other African-American bodies of interest to Dylan, the eleven-year old Woody also becomes a victim of violence, as he is menaced by three older hobos who resent his presence in the boxcar. However, Haynes eschews gritty realism and, instead, opts for the fantastical, undermining any potential connection to Civil Rights-era violence. Unlike Emmett Till, a fourteen-year old victim of a 1955 Mississippi hate crime and the subject of a still-unreleased 1963 Dylan protest ballad, the film's Woody survives his attack; Woody must survive, after all, since he represents a stage in Dylan's emerging and shifting masculinity. If we recall that Woody is a "fake," what is false, in part, is that this version of Dylan not only borrows an identity as an artist, but also borrows an identity as an adult male. Instead of perishing in that railcar attack, Woody leaps into a river, where he encounters a whale. Although we never see Woody swallowed (bringing to mind his Biblical counterpart, Jonah), he is clearly thrown ashore (again, like the prophet who spent three days in the belly of his own big fish) and eventually emerges with a new resolve.5
After being rescued by a white, middleclass couple (The Peacocks), Woody performs in their living room.6 Throughout this scene, Woody's race carries multiple layers of meaning. For some appropriate context, consider Sal Paradise's idealization of the so-called "Jazz America" in On the Road (204). African-American cultural forms--for Sal and Dean Moriarty the specific referents are Charlie Parker, Wardell Gray, and Slim Galliard, among others--are idealized because of their purported purity and authenticity. This discourse pervades I'm Not There as well. In the middle of Woody's rendition of "When the Ship Comes In," one the Peacocks' friends exclaims, "…and no formal training--remarkable." "White hipsters," to borrow Norman Mailer's familiar phrase, often adopted the language and the look of African-American artists (such as Dylan's Little Richard hairdo and linguistic affectations) and resorted to a discourse of black authenticity: an act of both "love and theft," as Dylan would one day admit indirectly via an album title.
Haynes also foregrounds several tropes of racial performance in the Peacocks' well-appointed living room. Woody's bow-tied attire and frequent recourse to "Yes, Sir" and "Yes, Ma'am" carries more than a hint of Uncle Tom-ing. In addition, Woody outlines his plan for commercial success: to be a "real singer on television" by "head [ing] straight to Hollywood and mak[ing] it big, just like… Elvis Presley," another artist well-versed in performing black during this same Eisenhower decade. Like Dylan's high-school coiffure, Elvis's "rockabilly" hairstyle emulated processed African-American styles--another convoluted case of white performing black performing white.7 As Woody delivers his own race performance for the Peacocks, however, he is soon exposed as inauthentic in other ways, when a Minnesota juvenile detention center calls the Peacocks to inquire about its missing charge. At this point in I'm Not There, Woody has no choice but to ramble again, this time for Greystone Park, a New Jersey state hospital, and the bedside of the real Woody Guthrie.
If Woody is a fake on many levels, his connection here to Dylan has as much to do with gender as it does with race. Woody is a fake insofar as he performs an advanced state of his own masculinity: an additional level of his performance for the Peacocks. Woody is not yet a man, but rather one attempting to perform a series of codes regulating masculine behavior--at least as the young man understands such codes. Woody clearly represents Dylan performing black--as Dylan has done from "See That My Grave is Kept Clean" in 1961 to singing of "ladies down in Darktown […] doing the Darktown Strut" ("Sugar Baby"--2001). However, as Eric Lott writes, minstrelsy's appeal extended beyond skin color and "depended in part on the momentary return of its partisans to a state of arrested development" (53). For Haynes, Dylan in 1959--who could channel Little Richard or Sorry Terry with equal ease--temporarily revisits his adolescence at a time when he is actually passing the threshold of adulthood. Haynes' implied argument is that the nineteen-year-old Dylan merely reverts to an earlier stage of his development--in other words, acting as if he is "a little black kid."
When Eric Lott describes the appeal of blackface in 19th-century America, his argument applies also to Dylan, Kerouac, and Mailer a century later: "To put on the cultural forms of blackness was to engage in a complex affair of manly mimicry […]. To wear or even enjoy blackface was literally, for a time, to become black, to inherit the cool, virility, humility, abandon, or gaité de coeur that were the prime components of white ideologies of black manhood" (52). At the height of the Civil Rights era in 1963, Norman Podhoretz describes something similar--a very particular "a negro problem" that I'm Not There also addresses:
[Just] as in childhood I envied Negroes for what seemed to me their superior masculinity, so I envy them today for what seems to be their superior physical grace and beauty. I have come to value physical grace very highly and I am now capable of aching with all my being when I watch a Negro couple on the dance floor, or a Negro playing baseball or basketball. They are on the kind of terms with their own bodies that I should like to be on with mine […]. (Podhoretz qtd. in Ross 69).
This discomfort with the white, male adolescent body described is, of course, part and parcel of a much larger postwar discourse that illustrates how, in Lott's words "dominant codes of masculinity in the United States [were] (and still [are]) partly negotiated through an imaginary black interlocutor" (53).8 One of the arguments of Lott's book is that the popularity of minstrelsy depends, in part, upon a return to an earlier stage of masculine development.
The implications of this process of masculine identification for analyzing I'm Not There in general, and Woody's function within the film, in particular, lie in the ways in which "Woody" represents a state of arrested development. Woody is our Dylan surrogate in 1959, when the calendar tells us that Dylan was an adult male. However, Woody is also eleven and about to enter the age when so many young men, in the words of writer Willie Morris "went Negro" (qtd. in Lott 53). Or, as scholar Leslie Fielder describes the process, "Born theoretically white, we are permitted to pass our childhood as imaginary Indians, our adolescence as imaginary Negroes, and only then are expected to settle down to being what we really are: white once more" (qtd. in Lott 53). For all of these writers--and I think this applies to Haynes' conception of Dylan's fluid identity--imagining oneself as black, or presenting oneself as such, is a chance to refashion an identity. What occurs on screen in the transition from Woody to Jack Rollins, and then from Robbie Clark to Jude and beyond, is analogous to a process explored by another Eisenhower-era artist: John Berryman. In Dream Songs, the poet's protagonist frequently reverts to blackface dialect, and scholar Peter Maber offers the following explanation: "Berryman, I believe, chose the minstrel show as a means both for self-exploration and for racial exploration precisely because of its contradictions and inauthenticity. The minstrel show figures as a site of inherent instability which climaxes in the possibility of a complete reversal" (134--emphasis mine). Again, we return to the inauthentic--or "fake" (to invoke the film's first image of Woody)--as the blackface mask is placed on and taken off as part of a very conscious process. The appeal of performing black, as Maber indicates above, is that it functions as a form of play--an act that can be dropped in an instant. So it should come as no surprise that once Woody arrives in New Jersey, the film's other versions of Dylan are, indeed, white once more. However, what changes in addition to Woody's race is the shift to another stage of masculine development. And yet, the possibility of performing black as part of that evolving construction of the masculine remains an ever-present option.
III--QUEERING THE BLACK AND THE MASCULINE
The story of the "fake" concludes as he arrives at the other Woody's New Jersey bedside. And what follows Woody's narrative is a shift to the "authentic": a documentary-style account of the career of Jack Rollins (Christian Bale). Reflecting its ostensibly more authentic mode, Jack's narrative is mediated in different ways than Woody's. As a genre, documentary defines itself in opposition to fiction films: "aim[ing] to present factual information about the world" (Bordwell 338). The more "factual" narration in the Rollins segments of I'm Not There offers viewers a rise and fall; the "rise" occurs when a well-scrubbed interviewee lauds Rollins as "honest," and the "fall" is his "betrayal" of folk ideals by writing and performing songs more heavily indebted to the French symbolist poets than to Guthrie or Odetta. However, before Jack moves from the authentic to inauthentic, Haynes juxtaposes found footage of violent Civil Rights-era protests with his own mock interviews and recreations of historic Dylan performances. For example, Jack performs "The Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll"--another Dylan narrative of a black body damaged--for a Student Non-Violence Coordinating Committee (SNCC) voter registration drive. Such an event did take place in Greenwood, Mississippi in July 1963, and Dylan performed on a makeshift concert stage very much like the one depicted in the film. The extant footage of the event, an excerpt of which appears in D.A. Pennebaker's Don't Look Back (1967), includes a bizarre and disorienting extreme close-up of Dylan's ear that Haynes carefully replicates.
What links Woody to Jack Rollins in this scene--aside from the obvious play on the authentic/inauthentic binary--is the way in which Jack's identity, visually speaking, is constructed through its juxtaposition with the African-American body. Although there are fewer attending the film's "Hattie Carroll" performance, the audience is predominantly male and African-American. As Mike Marqusee reports, the real-life media event was just as carefully constructed, as Dylan debuted a song, "Only a Pawn in Their Game," concerning the recent murder of NAACP activist Medgar Evers:
At dusk, the visiting performers clambered onto the back of a truck next to a cotton patch and performed for an audience of some 300 black people. They were watched by police in patrol cars and Klan members […]. By all accounts, the topicality of the song gripped the audience--some of whom would have seen Evers himself in recent months. (76)
Not only do black male bodies surround Jack during the performance, but the song also provides an illustration of how damage can be inflicted on the black male body and then institutionally sanctioned. Although Haynes substitutes "Hattie Carroll" for "Only a Pawn," the message in both is essentially the same: the true villain is not the individual who takes a life, but rather a justice system that tacitly condones the act through either an insignificant sentence ("Hattie Carroll") or a failure to convict despite overwhelming evidence ("Only a Pawn"). As I'm Not There reveals, at this stage of his career Dylan is still using the black body, albeit in more subtle ways, as a crucial way in which to construct his own masculine identity.
Filmmaker Ed Emschwiller--who filmed the actual Greenwood performance--was very conscious of the power of framing the young, white Dylan surrounded by an African-American audience under the surveillance of Klansmen and policemen. In Haynes' re-creation of the event, Jack projects courage and virility: a white Northerner unafraid to "speak out" in a potentially violent context. And, of course, the Greenwood concert is a performance in two senses: not only does Dylan / Rollins perform a new song for a receptive audience, but he also conceals his "real" discomfort during this SNCC event. According to Theodore Bikel, "Dylan admitted to the black farmers that 'he hadn't met a colored person till he was nine years old, and he apologized that he had so little to offer'" (qtd. in Marqusee 76). What Haynes' film reminds us at many such moments is that those "many lives of Bob Dylan" are a combination of Dylan's own efforts at identity construction and the efforts of those who construct Dylan's story for him (including filmmakers such as Ed Emschwiller and Todd Haynes).
Despite their obvious differences, Jack Rollins is linked to Woody in several ways; among them, Jack is the "troubadour of conscience" while Woody is referred to earlier by a carnival barker as "the tiny troubadour." Haynes provides many such threads that unite the film's Dylan surrogates. Sometimes Woody encounters these other Dylans directly (as when he wanders through the town of Riddle in a Charlie Chaplain-esque disguise during Billy's narrative), while, at other times, the linkages are thematic. One of the more clever instances of the latter involves Jude's arrival onstage at the New England Jazz and Folk Festival, clearly modeled after the infamous 1965 Newport Festival. As Jude and band arrive on stage, they open their instrument cases and remove automatic weapons. Not only does this symbolize the shock of Dylan "going electric," but it also connects to a question Woody receives in the boxcar: "Son, you wouldn't be stashing no weapons in that case of yours?" Woody's response ("No sir, not in any literalized way") foreshadows a subsequent stage in the film's exploration of masculinity. Based on the very queer Jude segment of I'm Not There, asking a character if he is "carrying any weapons in there" takes on an entirely new meaning.
If Woody is a less-than-subtle performance of a boy playing a man, then Jude is even more consciously performative. Jude provides a site for Dylan's confrontation of the accepted boundaries of masculinity altogether; Jude flamboyantly waves his hands, with their long-nailed fingers, and nearly topples over in his Cuban heels during casual conversations. Haynes clearly views Dylan's mid-sixties masculinity as yet another performance, and one connected to Dylan's aesthetic goals: "[The androgyny] was obviously evident in the Warhol Factory world and this influenced how [Dylan] dressed and behaved […]. Even if you weren't in a totally queer world, you dressed and acted that way if you were going to be on the cutting edge" (qtd. in Porton 20). As such, Haynes believes that Dylan "had a total crush on Allen Ginsberg," even though he qualifies it as a "love affair of the mind" (qtd. in Porton 20). Regardless of Dylan's sexuality, what is inescapable in both the film and Dylan's songs is that, more than ever before, Dylan's imagery (both his own image as an artist and the images that fill these 1965-66 songs) resembles no other version of masculinity that appeared previously in his art. This is not to say, however, that there are no further links between, say, Woody and Jude, since there are indeed elements of racial performance in Jude's persona. A major character who helps to structure Jude's narrative is "Mr. Jones," a composite modeled after the journalists who shadowed Dylan during his 1965 British tour. Jones' name obviously derives from Dylan's "Ballad of a Thin Man" and its well-known refrain: "Because something is happening here/ But you don't know what it is/ Do you, Mister Jones" (Lyrics 174-76). However, unlike the relatively oblivious Jones of the song, the character of this same name is less hipster poseur and more of a prick (pun intended) to Jude's social consciousness. During a program entitled Culture Beat, Jones castigates Jude regarding his "sincerity," and Jude becomes defensive, a response few reporters achieved with the young Dylan. However, something about Jones, in particular, gets under Jude's skin.
In a film so invested in gender identity--and given that Mister Jones is a character in an incredibly queer song--Haynes cannot resist the opportunity to once again explore performances of gender and race. At one point, Jones asks Jude, "Does it matter to you when songs you're writing now are being used as recruitment tools for militant street gangs, like the all-Negro faction in the United States, a group that promotes precisely the kinds of violence your earlier songs oppose?" Jude re-directs the question and replies, "If you're asking me if I'm a member of the Black Panther party, then the answer is no." Nevertheless, Dylan was actually a part of the Panthers' world. "Ballad of a Thin Man" was in heavy rotation at the San Francisco house where Huey Newton, Eldridge Cleaver, Bobby Seale and others first created the Black Panther newspaper; for Newton, in particular, "Thin Man" was "saying a hell of a lot about society" (qtd. in Marqusee 209). In Dylan's song, the Panthers found a vehicle to express their alienation, a process similar to the role that African-American music-from Little Richard to Blind Willie McTell--had helped to shape the ever-shifting identity of Bob Dylan. What I'm Not There reminds us at such moments is that, in the late sixties (as well as in the age of minstrelsy), cross-racial identification traveled in both directions.
In order to underscore how white performs black and vice-versa, Haynes includes "Ballad of a Thin Man" on the film's soundtrack, and it plays during one of the film's most provocative fantasy sequences. Following Jude's abrupt departure from Jones' limousine interview/interrogation, a P.O.V. shot reveals Jude's hand opening a public restroom door and then a naked image of Jones. When Jones receives a box labeled "Top Secret," he retreats to a study to examine its contents, only to find what looks like Dylan's high school yearbook. My readers will recall that the text accompanying Dylan's photo lists his ambition: "To join the band of Little Richard." Although Haynes shows us the photo (when he was still "Jacob Edelstein"), the shot fails to reveal the text accompanying the image. Instead, Haynes cuts to a shot of "militant Negroes" who are shown playing and rewinding a reel-to-reel tape recording of…"Ballad of a Thin Man." In one of the film's more humorous exchanges, Bobby (Rabbit Brown) and Huey (Craig Thomas) discuss what the song's "geeks" might signify, with Huey concluding that "Thin Man" says "a hell of a lot about society."
For many viewers, juxtaposing the Panthers and Dylan may seem overly obscure, but the film does so not merely to demonstrate the breadth of Dylan's cultural influence. Within this brief sequence, I'm Not There reveals two very different images of masculinity projected by Dylan's work. It may be a great distance from the "sword swallowers" in "Ballad of a Thin Man" to the machine-gun-toting, alpha-male Panthers, but Dylan's art somehow encompasses both. As black-tied white patrons laugh uncontrollably at a chicken-eating geek, Dylan's lyrics speak of someone handing Mister Jones a bone, and Jude passes an incredibly phallic microphone through the bars of Jones' cage. What Haynes suggests visually is a point not always addressed in gender studies approaches to Dylan's work: that Dylan could clearly foreground a playful queer sexuality, and that the variety of constructions of masculinity presented through his songs is much broader than is often assumed.
This is not to suggest that I'm Not There entirely avoids representing more traditional modes of masculinity. After all, the narrative of Robbie Clark illustrates a misogynistic streak in Dylan's work identified by, among others, Pamela Thurschwell, who describes how Dylan's art provokes a particular kind of discomfort for her as, "simultaneously a feminist and a fan of some wrenchingly misogynistic music" (264).9 Robbie manifests this particular gender identity in Dylan, the one best captured in the film by a conversation at a roadside cafe. When asked by a female friend if he is a chauvinist, Robbie answers,
Why [am I a chauvinist]? 'Cause I think guys and chicks are different? C'mon that's all I'm saying. And they are--they each have access to different kinds of pain. Which is pretty much why chicks can never be poets […]. Guys and chicks are different-I'm sorry.
Apparently, even when Dylan was channeling Little Richard as part of his masculine identity--keeping in mind the conspicuously queer elements of Richard's persona--there was always a part of Dylan's gender identity linked to "Robbie," particularly in the propensity for infidelity. For example, John Bucklen reports that Bob dated multiple girls while also dating Echo Helstrom; all of which contextualizes Clinton Heylin's claim that the "sixteen-year-old Bobby Zimmerman was not intimidated by 'goyrls/ liked them with a bit on top, and was a two-timer from the start"(19).
In the end, what complicates gender identity in I'm Not There is that we often see Dylan's construction of his masculinity seemingly at war with itself. Nowhere is this conflict more conspicuous than in Jude's narrative. Despite the ways in which Jude represents Dylan pushing at the boundaries of socially accepted definitions of masculinity, the character is not immune to engaging in some hetero, alpha-male competition with Sonny in the romantic struggle over Coco Rivington (Michelle Williams). When Coco baits Jude, attacking his masculinity by calling him "Jude-ee," Jude retorts by not really referring to Coco's pet (and angering his also-smitten friend in the process): "She has the sweetest little pussy--if you don't count the teeth." Even as Jude races around London with his "intellectual crush" Allen Ginsberg, a bit of Robbie (and Woody and others) expresses itself through Jude. Bringing to mind the phrases that appear on screen prior to the credits (I'm not her. I'm not here. I'm not there.), "Bob Dylan" is all of these people in all of these places. And all at the same time.
CONCLUSION
Throughout the present essay, I have analyzed one major character from I'm Not There in some detail (Woody), and have at least scratched the surface of three others (Jude, Jack and Robbie). Which means that three other major characters (Arthur Rimbaud, Billy, and Pastor John) escape analysis altogether. Clearly, a full-length monograph could be devoted to the ways in which race, masculinity and aesthetics converge in this fascinating film, and in the life and art of Bob Dylan. What is even more remarkable is that Haynes' Dylan's narrative concludes around 1980, meaning that Dylan's career as a performer and songwriter extends for nearly thirty more years (at the time of the film's release). Since 1980, Dylan has released more than a dozen studio albums, and his "Never Ending Tour" has seen him perform as many as one hundred concerts per year, every year, since 1988. In the three decades since the story of "Pastor John," Dylan's personal life has seen no shortage of drama: he has battled substance abuse, suffered a potentially life-threatening heart infection in 1997, and become a Madison Avenue icon, promoting brands ranging from Cadillac to Victoria's Secret. There is even the matter of Dylan's ongoing romantic dramas, including the possibility of "secret wives" following his divorce from Sara Dylan in 1977 (Heylin 709-11). So there are clearly far more than seven lives of Dylan to be explored by both filmmakers and Dylan scholars alike.
Given the breadth of the possible "Bob Dylans" available, Todd Haynes accomplishes a great deal in the two and a quarter hours of I'm Not There. Part of the film's success results from the ways in which it narrows its focus, not only chronologically (covering the period from 1959-1979), but also thematically. Although it is difficult to select one line from the film that captures its overarching thematic preoccupations, Jude provides a possible candidate during one of his amphetamine-fueled rants about possessing Coco Rivington. When an unnamed woman admits to Jude, "People said you could be a real cocksucker," Jude's reply speaks volumes about the film's insistence that gender is always a performance: "It's not what goes into a man's mouth that defines him." So many things come out of the mouth of the characters playing the seven Dylan surrogates in I'm Not There: often-contradictory messages about aesthetics, imitation, authenticity, and the ways in which race and gender identities are shaped through public discourses embedded in cultural and historical moments. One such discourse is the one that surrounds racial performance--how we all perform race, and how race performs us, in turn. In his fifty-year career as a performing artist, Bob Dylan has been no stranger to performing blackness, from "See That My Grave is Kept Clean" to his 1990s adaptation of the African-American murder ballad "Stack a Lee." What I'm Not There reminds us so skillfully, then, is that Dylan's performances of race are never quite distinct from his performances of masculinity, a lesson not lost upon scholars of American minstrelsy, and hopefully apparent to anyone with an interest in those many lives of Bob Dylan.
FOOTNOTES
1 Throughout the essay, I attribute authorship of the film to Haynes, the director and co-writer of the screenplay. Because I also acknowledge the contribution of co-screenwriter Oren Moverman, as well as countless others who have contributed to the film's formal construction and meaning, "Haynes" or "Haynes' film" is used merely to enhance the readability of the essay.
2 In order to avoid confusion, as a rule I use "Woody" to signify the character in Haynes' film and "Guthrie" or "Woody Guthrie" to signify the real-life person who so influenced the young Bob Dylan.
3 Although we briefly see other Dylan surrogates on screen prior to Woody's introduction, the film's narrative development begins with Woody. We also see glimpses of Woody appear within the diegetic world of other our other Dylan surrogates, such as when Claire (Charlotte Gainsbourg), the wife of the mid-70s-era Robbie Clark (Heath Ledger), has a dream involving Woody, or when Billy (Richard Gere), the outlaw persona that Dylan has regularly embraced, encounters Woody being thrown from a saloon in the fictitious town of Riddle, Missouri.
4 In his liner notes to Joan Baez's In Concert, Part 2 (1963), Dylan writes, "my first idol was Hank Williams."
5 For a reading of Jonah as a kind of "fake," see The Oxford Companion to the Bible (380-81). I should also point out that my former student, Karl Gustafson, has reminded me that whales are mammals, not fish; that said, the phrase "belly of his own big mammal" lacks alliteration, and thus I have avoided it in the body of the essay. I would also like to express my gratitude to Karl for his insightful response to an earlier draft of this essay.
6 The song Woody performs for the Peacocks is "When the Ship Comes In." As a song of prophecy, this connects Woody once again to the prophet Jonah. It should be noted, too, that the song also bears a connection to the 1963 "March on Washington," an event at which Dylan performed this song and shared a stage with Martin Luther King, Jr.. So not only is this a prophetic song, but also the kind of song that Dylan would tire of performing not far into his career: if s the kind of "finger-pointing" song that educated middle-class audiences like the Peacocks would come to expect from Dylan, but that which he would outgrow artistically by 1964-65.
7 See chapter 3, "The New Negro" in Nelson George's The Death of Rhythm and Blues (1988).
8 For an extensive discussion of this subject, see Norman Mailer's "The White Negro" (1957), a work that may help readers begin to make sense of, for example, some of those puzzling moments in Jack Kerouac's On the Road (1957) when narrator Sal Paradise considers himself among the people of color of the Earth ("They thought I was a Mexican, of course; and in a way I am"--98). The tendency among middle-class white males to idealize African-American culture in the most general ways, and idealize African-American artists in particular, can actually be traced back well beyond the 1950s, as Andrew Ross makes clear in his essay "Hip, and the Long Front of Color" (published in No Respect: Intellectuals and Popular Culture--1989). However, Eisenhower America served as a mass gathering place for cross-racial identification, particularly among educated middle-class white men.
9 For every song Thurschwell cites as expressing Dylan's potential for more enlightened gender views, such as "Up to Me" (1975) or "Highlands" (1997), she can also offer a reading of "Sweetheart Like You" (1983) or "Is Your Love in Vain?" (1978), the latter containing those oft-cited (and cringe-inducing) lines, "Can you cook and sew, make flowers grow / Do you understand my pain?" (Lyrics 389).
A Pensive Woody Guthrie (Marcus Carl Franklin) in I'm Not There (2007).
Woody Performs for the Peacock Family.
Jude (Cate Blanchett) as the "Electric" (and Androgynous) mid-60s Bob Dylan.
Woody Rides the Rails.
WORKS CITED
Bordwell, David and Kristin Thompson. Film Art. 8th Ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2008.
Bauldie, John. Wanted Man: In Search of Bob Dylan. New York: Citadel, 1990.
Cott, Jonathan, ed. Bob Dylan: The Essential Interviews. New York: Wenner, 2006.
Dylan, Bob. Chronicles, Volume One. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2004.
____. Liner notes to Joan Baez in Concert, Part 2. Rec. 1962-63. LP. Vanguard, 1963.
____. Lyrics 1962-2001. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2004.
George, Nelson. The Death of Rhythm and Blues. New York: Pantheon, 1988.
Hedin, Benjamin, ed. Studio A: The Bob Dylan Reader. New York: Norton, 2004.
Hentoff, Nat. "The Playboy Interview: Bob Dylan." Bob Dylan: The Early Years-A Retrospective. Ed. Craig McGregor. N.p.: Da Capo, 1990, 124-45.
Heylin, Clinton. Bob Dylan: Behind the Shades Revisted. New York: HarperCollins, 2001.
I'm Not There. Dir. Todd Haynes. Perf. Marcus Carl Franklin and Cate Blanchett. 2007. DVD. Weinstein, 2008.
"I'm Not There." Wikipedia. 2009. 8 June 2009 <http: / / en.wikipedia.org / wiki / I'm_Not_There.
Kerouac, Jack. On the Road. New York: Penguin, 1976.
Lott, Eric. Love and Theft: Blackface Minstrelsy and the American Working Class. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1995.
Maber, Peter. "'So-called black: Reassessing John Berryman's Blackface Minstrelsy." Arizona Quarterly 64.4 (2008): 129-49.
Marqusee, Mike. Chimes of Freedom: The Politics of Bob Dylan's Art.
Mailer, Norman. "The White Negro." Advertisements for Myself. New York: G.P. Putnam, 1959.
The Oxford Companion to The Bible. Eds. Bruce Metzger and Michael Coogan. New York: Oxford UP, 1993.
Porton, Richard. "The Many Faces of Bob Dylan: An Interview With Todd Haynes." Cineaste (Winter 2007): 20-23.
Ross, Andrew. No Respect: Intellectuals and Popular Culture. New York: Routledge, 1989.
Scaduto, Anthony. Dylan. New York: Signet, 1973.
Shank, Barry. "'That Wild Mercury Sound': Bob Dylan and the Illusion of American Culture." boundary 2. 29:1 (2002): 97-123.
Thurschwell, Pamela. "A Different Baby Blue." 'Do you, Mr. Jones?': Bob Dylan With the Poets and Professors. Ed Neil Corcoran. London: Pimlico, 2003.
~~~~~~~~
By JOHN McCOMBE
JOHN McCOMBE is Associate Director of the University Honors Program and an associate professor of English at the University of Dayton. His interests include twentieth-century British literature, film, and popular music studies. He has published more than a dozen articles in journals such as Cinema Journal, Journal of Modern Literature, and the Henry James Review.

Copyright of this work is the property of Post Script and its content may not be copied without the copyright holder's express written permission except for the print or download capabilities of the retrieval software used for access. This content is intended solely for the use of the individual user.
Accession Number: 76183711

No comments:

Post a Comment